|
Call Now! 1-866-932-8412 or
Email: info@mortgagegirl.ca |
Love money is usually given by close family or friends to young couples who fail to meet the the capital requirements that financial institutions look for in borrowers. When applying for mortgages on a new property, love money is in many cases the only way a newly-married couple can get the sort of financing that would be just impossible to obtain through traditional channels. That way the financing is used for the down-payment so the couple can qualify for a bank mortgage.
However, one in two marriages end in divorce and that’s no secret to parents giving their young married children money to buy a house. So the best way of preventing future problems is by securing that money with a second mortgage. However care must be taken when registering love money as a second mortgage, because if the couple has already told the bank that their down-payment funds are a gift from immediate family, a “gift letter” signed by the donor is usually required (to confirm that the funds are a true gift and not a loan), while at the same time the couple are signing a mortgage themselves, in the future, if a dispute arises out of that mortgage, that gift letter could be used to challenge any paying back of the parents’ love money in case of marriage breakdown.
One of the ways of mitigating the problems associated with family mortgages is by formalizing the mortgage in a way that protects everyone involved. That involves implementing features found in any “commercial loan,” such as an interest rate, payment terms, term of the loan, etc. These are the kind of provisions that would prevent a departing spouse from failing to fulfill his or her obligations.
To that effect there are social lending services which gives friends and family a more structured way to lend or borrow money with each other. That way the recipient honors the payments based on the frequency and interest rate set by the family member lending that love money and the risk associated to missed payments is considerably reduced.
Do all these proceedings sound kind of churlish to you? That’s the result of mixing love with money and in many cases the best way for a young couple to avoid a family fight is to reject those generous offers from family members and instead borrow more money and buy mortgage insurance, if they could just afford it, that is.
Finance Minister to toughen mortgage rules
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has made the following three announcements to mortgage insurance rules:
1. Variable mortgages qualified at five year fixed rate;
2. Refinancing limited to 90% instead of 95%;
3. Non owner occupied residences require 20% down payment;
These changes will take effect April 19th. See article below:
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty announced new rules Tuesday aimed at preventing homebuyers from getting into financial difficulty when mortgage rates rise.
After consulting with major Canadian lenders, Flaherty outlined the latest weapons at Ottawa’s disposal aimed at removing some of the speculative froth in the housing market.
“There is no evidence of a housing bubble, but we’re taking prudent steps today to prevent one,”
“If some lenders aren’t willing to act themselves, we will act.”
Broadly speaking, the plan unveiled has three components.
First, Ottawa will require that all borrowers meet the standards for a five-year fixed-rate mortgage, even if they choose a variable mortgage with a lower rate or a shorter term.
“This will guard against higher rates in the future,” Flaherty said.
Second, the rules would lower the maximum Canadians can withdraw when refinancing their mortgages to 90 per cent of the value of their home, from 95 per cent.
And finally, Ottawa will now require a minimum 20 per cent down payment to qualify for CMHC insurance for non-owner-occupied properties purchased as an investment.
The last rule is aimed at reining in would-be real estate speculators who own multiple properties beyond their primary residence.
“We want to discourage the tendency some people have to use a home as an ATM, or buy three or four condos on speculation,”
Flaherty said.
Minimum down payment unchanged
There had been speculation the Department of Finance might implement legislation raising the minimum down payment from five to 10 per cent of a home’s value, or reduce the maximum amortization period from 35 years to 30 years.
Those measures were not part of Flaherty’s announcement Tuesday, but all options are still on the table should circumstances change, Flaherty said.
The adjustments to the mortgage insurance guarantee framework, to be implemented as of April 19, 2010, are not likely to revolutionize the industry. Indeed, a number of large Canadian lenders already practise the first peg of Flaherty’s plan. After Tuesday’s announcement, Bank of Montreal noted that it requires its high-ratio borrowers to be able to qualify using the five-year rate.
“While we do not believe that Canada faces a housing bubble, we fully support the minister’s actions,”
the bank said in a release.
“Given the prospect of higher interest rates and the recent run-up in housing prices in some markets across Canada, the measures announced today are prudent.”
“This is a little bit late in telling Canadians we need to be more cautious in taking out a mortgage,”
Royal Bank chief economist Patricia Croft said in reaction to Flaherty’s announcement.
Though she stopped short of calling Canadian real estate in bubble territory already, she said the April 19 date for implementation is actually likely to cause more short-term stimulation of the market, as people scramble to get in under the deadline.
“If you wanted to buy a house, wouldn’t you now do it before April?” Croft asked. “It’s even more evidence that house prices are going to cool down later this year.”
Street Capital Grows Out West
A year ago, the liquidity crisis had many non-bank lenders questioning their competitiveness. Street Capital is the perfect example of how much things have changed.
The company is on a growth path, with solid funding sources in place and a brand new western Canada underwriting office.
Street’s Vancouver grand opening was well attended on Tuesday, with senior management and underwriters meeting with brokers from around the region.
Unlike some lenders who’ve been reducing their approved-broker lists, Street says its plan is to increase the number of brokers it deals with.
“We will be doubling our sales force across the country to continue to take advantage of the distribution power of the mortgage broker channel,” says Jason Humeniuk, VP Sales, Western Canada.
“Our commitment to the broker market in Canada, and in this case Western Canada, remains strong,” he adds.
This does appear evident from the investment the company has made in human capital and infrastructure in Vancouver.
Street says it is committed to equipping brokers with better “tools and knowledge” to stay competitive. In our humble view, the best thing a lender can do for brokers (and customers) is offer innovative products at competitive rates, and that’s exactly what Street seems willing to do. Its new industry-first 1-year variable is case in point.
Potential rate increases report from CAAMP
CAAMP has recently released a report on potential rate increases and their impact on mortgage debt levels.
To view a copy visit www.caamp.org
Bank of Canada Interest Rate
| December 8, 2009 | 0.25% |
| January 19, 2010 | 0.25%* |
| March 2, 2010 | Next meeting date |
Source: Bank of Canada
*Bank of Canada statement included reference to hold rate to end of second quarter 2010
Bank Prime Lending Rate
| December 9, 2009 | 2.25% |
| January 20, 2010 | 2.25% |
| March 3, 2010 | Next meeting date |
Source: Bank of Canada
US Federal Reserve Board Discount Rate
| December 15, 2009 | 0.00% – 0.25% |
| January 27, 2010 | 0.00% – 0.25% |
| March 16, 2010 | Next meeting date |
Source: US Federal Reserve
Exchange Rate $CDN($US)
| December 24, 2009 | .9525 |
| January 15, 2010 | .9714 |
| January 27, 2010 | .9392 |
Source: Bank of Canada
Government of Canada Bonds
| Bond Type | December 23, 2009 |
January 13, 2010 |
January 27, 2010 |
| 1 year Treasury Bill | 0.66% | 0.60% | 0.56% |
| 3 year Benchmark Bond Yield |
1.82% | 1.80% | 1.66% |
| 5 year Benchmark Bond Yield |
2.70% | 2.72% | 2.46% |
| 10 year Benchmark Bond Yield |
3.57% | 3.61% | 3.35% |
Source: Bank of Canada
Total New Housing Starts (Seasonable adjusted and annualized)
| Province | October 2009 |
October 2008 |
November 2009 |
November 2008 |
December 2009 |
December 2008 |
| Newfoundland/Labrador | 2,900 | 3,100 | 3,200 | 2,700 | 4,200 | 4,000 |
| PEI | 1,200 | 600 | 1,000 | 800 | 1,300 | 900 |
| Nova Scotia | 4,000 | 4,300 | 2,800 | 3,600 | 2,900 | 3,000 |
| New Brunswick | 3,600 | 5,000 | 3,900 | 3,900 | 3,600 | 3,000 |
| Quebec | 37,200 | 48,400 | 40,400 | 48,200 | 51,600 | 44,000 |
| Ontario | 57,600 | 82,600 | 53,000 | 58,300 | 56,300 | 66,100 |
| Manitoba | 4,200 | 5,800 | 4,200 | 5,900 | 3,400 | 6,400 |
| Saskatchewan | 3,600 | 4,900 | 6,100 | 5,700 | 4,500 | 4,700 |
| Alberta | 25,000 | 24,700 | 24,800 | 20,400 | 27,800 | 20,000 |
| British Columbia | 18,200 | 32,300 | 19,200 | 22,400 | 22,200 | 23,100 |
| Canada | 157,400 | 211,800 | 158,500 | 172,000 | 177,800 | 172,200 |
Source: CMHC Housing Now – December 2009 and December 2008.
This seasonally adjusted data goes through stages of revision at different times of the year.
Average MLS resale price for local markets
| City | December 2008 | December 2009 |
| Halifax | $234,063 | $246,380 |
| Saint John | $156,923 | $178,037 |
| Quebec | $203,239 | $231,235 |
| Montreal | $267,050 | $285,356 |
| Ottawa | $272,672 | $311,604 |
| Toronto | $361,284 | $411,931 |
| Hamilton/Burlington | $240,073 | $285,795 |
| Winnipeg | $182,814 | $209,963 |
| Saskatoon | $266,411 | $291,554 |
| Calgary | $362,557 | $394,300 |
| Edmonton | $310,974 | $319,201 |
| Vancouver | $560,953 | $627,582 |
| Victoria | $444,222 | $522,211 |
Source: Canadian Real Estate Association
Royal Lepage 2009 Q4 Hourse Price Survey
Detached Bungalows
| Market | Q4 2009 Average |
Last Quarter Average |
Q4 2008 Average |
Bungalow % Change |
| Halifax | 239,000 | 241,000 | 215,000 | 10.7% |
| Charlottetown | 160,000 | 160,000 | 157,000 | 1.9% |
| Moncton | 152,300 | 165,240 | 150,000 | 1.5% |
| Fredericton | 182,000 | 180,000 | 162,000 | 12.3% |
| Saint John | 228,000 | 177,980 | 225,064 | 1.3% |
| St. John’s | 217,167 | 215,000 | 190,050 | 14.3% |
| Montreal | 248,157 | 240,045 | 237,855 | 4.3% |
| Ottawa | 332,417 | 328,667 | 321,333 | 3.4% |
| Toronto | 446,214 | 437,929 | 405,917 | 9.9% |
| Winnipeg | 241,650 | 240,875 | 219,886 | 9.9% |
| Regina | 273,000 | 273,000 | 274,167 | -0.4% |
| Saskatoon | 310,500 | 311,500 | 300,000 | 3.5% |
| Calgary | 412,478 | 401,944 | 410,333 | 0.5% |
| Edmonton | 299,286 | 308,571 | 301,429 | -0.7% |
| Vancouver | 828,750 | 802,500 | 743,750 | 11.4% |
| Victoria | 474,000 | 465,000 | 440,000 | 7.7% |
| National | 315,055 | 309,328 | 297,111 | 6.04% |
Standard Two Storey
| Market | Q4 2009 Average |
Last Quarter Average |
Q4 2008 Average |
2 Storey % Change |
| Halifax | 265,333 | 265,333 | 260,667 | 1.8% |
| Charlottetown | 195,000 | 190,000 | 188,000 | 3.7% |
| Moncton | 131,000 | 137,000 | 126,000 | 4.0% |
| Fredericton | 210,000 | 205,000 | 210,000 | 0.0% |
| Saint John | 299,000 | 237,905 | 294,625 | 1.5% |
| St. John’s | 298,833 | 296,667 | 261,800 | 14.1% |
| Montreal | 357,888 | 343,480 | 308,018 | 3.3% |
| Ottawa | 331,917 | 327,833 | 320,083 | 3.7% |
| Toronto | 554,175 | 561,725 | 544,842 | 3.5% |
| Winnipeg | 275,500 | 265,938 | 250,529 | 10.0% |
| Regina | 259,000 | 251,500 | 245,000 | 5.7% |
| Saskatoon | 338,750 | 340,750 | 328,750 | 3.0% |
| Calgary | 427,067 | 414,556 | 417,511 | 2.3% |
| Edmonton | 340,557 | 327,429 | 344,636 | -1.2% |
| Vancouver | 917,500 | 904,750 | 837,500 | 9.6% |
| Victoria | 449,000 | 449,000 | 433,000 | 3.7% |
| National | 353,026 | 344,929 | 335,689 | 5.2% |
Standard Condominium
| Market | Q4 2009 Average |
Last Quarter Average |
Q4 2008 Average |
Condo % Change |
| Halifax | 167,000 | 196,500 | 159,500 | 4.7% |
| Charlottetown | 122,000 | 120,000 | 120,000 | 1.7% |
| Moncton | ||||
| Fredericton | 145,000 | 145,000 | 133,000 | 9.0% |
| Saint John | 160,000 | 136,876 | 158,283 | 1.1% |
| St. John’s | 230,333 | 230,000 | 203,000 | 13.5% |
| Montreal | 220,625 | 213,278 | 186,706 | 5.0% |
| Ottawa | 218,167 | 213,583 | 207,833 | 5.0% |
| Toronto | 309,316 | 300,632 | 300,722 | 2.9% |
| Winnipeg | 153,929 | 145,614 | 133,083 | 15.7% |
| Regina | 185,000 | 185,000 | 172,917 | 7.0% |
| Saskatoon | 197,500 | 210,000 | 186,500 | 5.9% |
| Calgary | 256,056 | 249,500 | 257,189 | -0.4% |
| Edmonton | 213,380 | 213,250 | 206,854 | 3.2% |
| Vancouver | 452,750 | 445,500 | 405,000 | 11.8% |
| Victoria | 265,000 | 275,000 | 265,000 | 0.0% |
| National | 205,756 | 204,358 | 193,474 | 6.35% |
Source: Royal Lepage
