LiveZilla Live Help
Call Now! 1-866-932-8412 or
Email: info@mortgagegirl.ca

Love money is usually given by close family or friends to young couples who fail to meet the the capital requirements that financial institutions look for in borrowers. When applying for mortgages on a new property, love money is in many cases the only way a newly-married couple can get the sort of financing that would be just impossible to obtain through traditional channels. That way the financing is used for the down-payment so the couple can qualify for a bank mortgage.

However, one in two marriages end in divorce and that’s no secret to parents giving their young married children money to buy a house. So the best way of preventing future problems is by securing that money with a second mortgage. However care must be taken when registering love money as a second mortgage, because if the couple has already told the bank that their down-payment funds are a gift from immediate family, a “gift letter” signed by the donor is usually required (to confirm that the funds are a true gift and not a loan), while at the same time the couple are signing a mortgage themselves, in the future, if a dispute arises out of that mortgage, that gift letter could be used to challenge any paying back of the parents’ love money in case of marriage breakdown.

One of the ways of mitigating the problems associated with family mortgages is by formalizing the mortgage in a way that protects everyone involved. That involves implementing features found in any “commercial loan,” such as an interest rate, payment terms, term of the loan, etc. These are the kind of provisions that would prevent a departing spouse from failing to fulfill his or her obligations.

To that effect there are social lending services which gives friends and family a more structured way to lend or borrow money with each other. That way the recipient honors the payments based on the frequency and interest rate set by the family member lending that love money and the risk associated to missed payments is considerably reduced.

Do all these proceedings sound kind of churlish to you? That’s the result of mixing love with money and in many cases the best way for a young couple to avoid a family fight is to reject those generous offers from family members and instead borrow more money and buy mortgage insurance, if they could just afford it, that is.

Jim FlahertyFinance Minister Jim Flaherty has made the following three announcements to mortgage insurance rules:

1.      Variable mortgages qualified at five year fixed rate;

2.      Refinancing limited to 90% instead of 95%;

3.      Non owner occupied residences require 20% down payment;

These changes will take effect April 19th. See article below:

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty announced new rules Tuesday aimed at preventing homebuyers from getting into financial difficulty when mortgage rates rise.

After consulting with major Canadian lenders, Flaherty outlined the latest weapons at Ottawa’s disposal aimed at removing some of the speculative froth in the housing market.

“There is no evidence of a housing bubble, but we’re taking prudent steps today to prevent one,”
“If some lenders aren’t willing to act themselves, we will act.”

Broadly speaking, the plan unveiled has three components.

First, Ottawa will require that all borrowers meet the standards for a five-year fixed-rate mortgage, even if they choose a variable mortgage with a lower rate or a shorter term.

“This will guard against higher rates in the future,” Flaherty said.

Second, the rules would lower the maximum Canadians can withdraw when refinancing their mortgages to 90 per cent of the value of their home, from 95 per cent.

And finally, Ottawa will now require a minimum 20 per cent down payment to qualify for CMHC insurance for non-owner-occupied properties purchased as an investment.

The last rule is aimed at reining in would-be real estate speculators who own multiple properties beyond their primary residence.

“We want to discourage the tendency some people have to use a home as an ATM, or buy three or four condos on speculation,”

Flaherty said.

Minimum down payment unchanged

There had been speculation the Department of Finance might implement legislation raising the minimum down payment from five to 10 per cent of a home’s value, or reduce the maximum amortization period from 35 years to 30 years.

Those measures were not part of Flaherty’s announcement Tuesday, but all options are still on the table should circumstances change, Flaherty said.

The adjustments to the mortgage insurance guarantee framework, to be implemented as of April 19, 2010, are not likely to revolutionize the industry. Indeed, a number of large Canadian lenders already practise the first peg of Flaherty’s plan. After Tuesday’s announcement, Bank of Montreal noted that it requires its high-ratio borrowers to be able to qualify using the five-year rate.

“While we do not believe that Canada faces a housing bubble, we fully support the minister’s actions,”

the bank said in a release.

“Given the prospect of higher interest rates and the recent run-up in housing prices in some markets across Canada, the measures announced today are prudent.”

“This is a little bit late in telling Canadians we need to be more cautious in taking out a mortgage,”

Royal Bank chief economist Patricia Croft said in reaction to Flaherty’s announcement.

Though she stopped short of calling Canadian real estate in bubble territory already, she said the April 19 date for implementation is actually likely to cause more short-term stimulation of the market, as people scramble to get in under the deadline.

“If you wanted to buy a house, wouldn’t you now do it before April?” Croft asked. “It’s even more evidence that house prices are going to cool down later this year.”

A year ago, the liquidity crisis had many non-bank lenders questioning their competitiveness.  Street Capital is the perfect example of how much things have changed.

Street-Capital The company is on a growth path, with solid funding sources in place and a brand new western Canada underwriting office.

Street’s Vancouver grand opening was well attended on Tuesday, with senior management and underwriters meeting with brokers from around the region.

Unlike some lenders who’ve been reducing their approved-broker lists, Street says its plan is to increase the number of brokers it deals with.

“We will be doubling our sales force across the country to continue to take advantage of the distribution power of the mortgage broker channel,” says Jason Humeniuk, VP Sales, Western Canada.

“Our commitment to the broker market in Canada, and in this case Western Canada, remains strong,” he adds.

This does appear evident from the investment the company has made in human capital and infrastructure in Vancouver.

Street says it is committed to equipping brokers with better “tools and knowledge” to stay competitive.  In our humble view, the best thing a lender can do for brokers (and customers) is offer innovative products at competitive rates, and that’s exactly what Street seems willing to do.  Its new industry-first 1-year variable is case in point.

CAAMP has recently released a report on potential rate increases and their impact on mortgage debt levels.
To view a copy visit www.caamp.org

Bank of Canada Interest Rate

December 8, 2009 0.25%
January 19, 2010 0.25%*
March 2, 2010 Next meeting date

Source: Bank of Canada
*Bank of Canada statement included reference to hold rate to end of second quarter 2010

Bank Prime Lending Rate

December 9, 2009 2.25%
January 20, 2010 2.25%
March 3, 2010 Next meeting date

Source: Bank of Canada

US Federal Reserve Board Discount Rate

December 15, 2009 0.00% – 0.25%
January 27, 2010 0.00% – 0.25%
March 16, 2010 Next meeting date

Source: US Federal Reserve

Exchange Rate $CDN($US)

December 24, 2009 .9525
January 15, 2010 .9714
January 27, 2010 .9392

Source: Bank of Canada

Government of Canada Bonds

Bond Type December 23,
2009
January 13,
2010
January 27, 2010
1 year Treasury Bill 0.66% 0.60% 0.56%
3 year Benchmark
Bond Yield
1.82% 1.80% 1.66%
5 year Benchmark
Bond Yield
2.70% 2.72% 2.46%
10 year Benchmark
Bond Yield
3.57% 3.61% 3.35%

Source: Bank of Canada

Total New Housing Starts (Seasonable adjusted and annualized)

Province October
2009
October
2008
November
2009
November
2008
December
2009
December
2008
Newfoundland/Labrador 2,900 3,100 3,200 2,700 4,200 4,000
PEI 1,200 600 1,000 800 1,300 900
Nova Scotia 4,000 4,300 2,800 3,600 2,900 3,000
New Brunswick 3,600 5,000 3,900 3,900 3,600 3,000
Quebec 37,200 48,400 40,400 48,200 51,600 44,000
Ontario 57,600 82,600 53,000 58,300 56,300 66,100
Manitoba 4,200 5,800 4,200 5,900 3,400 6,400
Saskatchewan 3,600 4,900 6,100 5,700 4,500 4,700
Alberta 25,000 24,700 24,800 20,400 27,800 20,000
British Columbia 18,200 32,300 19,200 22,400 22,200 23,100
Canada 157,400 211,800 158,500 172,000 177,800 172,200

Source: CMHC Housing Now – December 2009 and December 2008.
This seasonally adjusted data goes through stages of revision at different times of the year.


Average MLS resale price for local markets

City December 2008 December 2009
Halifax $234,063 $246,380
Saint John $156,923 $178,037
Quebec $203,239 $231,235
Montreal $267,050 $285,356
Ottawa $272,672 $311,604
Toronto $361,284 $411,931
Hamilton/Burlington $240,073 $285,795
Winnipeg $182,814 $209,963
Saskatoon $266,411 $291,554
Calgary $362,557 $394,300
Edmonton $310,974 $319,201
Vancouver $560,953 $627,582
Victoria $444,222 $522,211

Source: Canadian Real Estate Association

Royal Lepage 2009 Q4 Hourse Price Survey

Detached Bungalows

Market Q4 2009
Average
Last Quarter
Average
Q4 2008
Average
Bungalow
% Change
Halifax 239,000 241,000 215,000 10.7%
Charlottetown 160,000 160,000 157,000 1.9%
Moncton 152,300 165,240 150,000 1.5%
Fredericton 182,000 180,000 162,000 12.3%
Saint John 228,000 177,980 225,064 1.3%
St. John’s 217,167 215,000 190,050 14.3%
Montreal 248,157 240,045 237,855 4.3%
Ottawa 332,417 328,667 321,333 3.4%
Toronto 446,214 437,929 405,917 9.9%
Winnipeg 241,650 240,875 219,886 9.9%
Regina 273,000 273,000 274,167 -0.4%
Saskatoon 310,500 311,500 300,000 3.5%
Calgary 412,478 401,944 410,333 0.5%
Edmonton 299,286 308,571 301,429 -0.7%
Vancouver 828,750 802,500 743,750 11.4%
Victoria 474,000 465,000 440,000 7.7%
National 315,055 309,328 297,111 6.04%

Standard Two Storey

Market Q4 2009
Average
Last Quarter
Average
Q4 2008
Average
2 Storey
% Change
Halifax 265,333 265,333 260,667 1.8%
Charlottetown 195,000 190,000 188,000 3.7%
Moncton 131,000 137,000 126,000 4.0%
Fredericton 210,000 205,000 210,000 0.0%
Saint John 299,000 237,905 294,625 1.5%
St. John’s 298,833 296,667 261,800 14.1%
Montreal 357,888 343,480 308,018 3.3%
Ottawa 331,917 327,833 320,083 3.7%
Toronto 554,175 561,725 544,842 3.5%
Winnipeg 275,500 265,938 250,529 10.0%
Regina 259,000 251,500 245,000 5.7%
Saskatoon 338,750 340,750 328,750 3.0%
Calgary 427,067 414,556 417,511 2.3%
Edmonton 340,557 327,429 344,636 -1.2%
Vancouver 917,500 904,750 837,500 9.6%
Victoria 449,000 449,000 433,000 3.7%
National 353,026 344,929 335,689 5.2%

Standard Condominium

Market Q4 2009
Average
Last Quarter
Average
Q4 2008
Average
Condo %
Change
Halifax 167,000 196,500 159,500 4.7%
Charlottetown 122,000 120,000 120,000 1.7%
Moncton
Fredericton 145,000 145,000 133,000 9.0%
Saint John 160,000 136,876 158,283 1.1%
St. John’s 230,333 230,000 203,000 13.5%
Montreal 220,625 213,278 186,706 5.0%
Ottawa 218,167 213,583 207,833 5.0%
Toronto 309,316 300,632 300,722 2.9%
Winnipeg 153,929 145,614 133,083 15.7%
Regina 185,000 185,000 172,917 7.0%
Saskatoon 197,500 210,000 186,500 5.9%
Calgary 256,056 249,500 257,189 -0.4%
Edmonton 213,380 213,250 206,854 3.2%
Vancouver 452,750 445,500 405,000 11.8%
Victoria 265,000 275,000 265,000 0.0%
National 205,756 204,358 193,474 6.35%

Source: Royal Lepage